Self Efficacy Theory

Published: 27th June 2011
Views: N/A

Bandura (1997) defined self-efficacy as being the belief that one can properly perform certain exercise as a way to complete a certain result. Self-efficacy values are not about individual's abilities objectively; they are about the persons judgements of whatever they can achieve with those abilities (Duda, 1998). Bandura (1997) proposed that self-efficacy beliefs effect psychosocial conduct. These beliefs have an effect on thought behaviours, emotional responses and thought behaviour in a variety of situations. One example is, people will avoid situations they believe they aren't equipped to handle; their degree of self-efficacy will also influence their amount of effort and establish how much they persist when confronted with failure. Those that have high self-efficacy can focus more effort about the task on hand and persevere more than people with low self-efficacy (Gencay, 2009).

Bandura (1997) shows that efficacy values are formed as a consequence of sophisticated thoughts of self-appraisal and self-persuasion from unique efficacy sources of information; he listed these resources as past performance successes, vicarious experiences, verbal persuasion and physiological states.

Past performance successes have shown to are the most influential supply of efficacy information since they are based on a individuals own experiences of success or failure (Bandura, 1997). Individuals who view past overall performance as successes will have increased self-efficacy beliefs; however, if these experiences have been seen as failures, then self-efficacy beliefs will probably decrease (Feltz et al, 2008).

Vicarious experiences impact on self-efficacy as information may be derived through people observing and comparing themselves to others (Feltz et al, 2008). Bandura (1997) implies that this action involves watching the performance of others, coding the result which has been observed, noting the result of the performance and lastly using that information to make decisions about your ownlevel of mastery. Vicarious influences also include social judgements, as an example, contemplating others regarding their physique could have an impact on self-efficacy (Weinberg, Gould & Jackson, 1979, cited by Feltz et al, 2008). Vicarious resources for efficacy information are generally considered to be weaker than past performance accomplishments (Duda, 1998).

Verbal persuasion information effects self-efficacy through elements which includes evaluative feedback, requirements by others, self-talk, imagery together with other cognitive strategies; self efficacy beliefs determined by these sources are likewise said to be weaker compared to those of performance accomplishments (Duda, 1998).
Physiological information affects self-efficacy as individuals cognitively evaluate their physiological condition and state to form judgements about their efficacy (Feltz et al, 2008). Physiological information is derived from factors such as fitness, levels of fatigue and pain; and also psycho-physiological factors such as arousal, fear, a lack of self-confidence and ones capacity to get psyched up and prepared for performance (Duda, 1998). Physiological information has been shown to be a more important source of info affecting self-efficacy in physical action tasks in comparison to nonphysical tasks (Chase et al, 1994; Feltz & Reissinger, 1990, cited by Duda, 1998 and Feltz et al, 2008).

Research suggests that the relationship between self efficacy and behavior is a reciprocal one in character (Weinberg & Gould, 2003). In a sporting context, a player or coach with previous high degrees of performance will show higher self efficacy, these feelings of high self efficacy thus have a favorable effect on performance.

Report this article Ask About This Article

More to Explore